November 17, 2011

Jewish Writers

In 1970, when I was living in Glasgow, a close friend suggested I read Saul Bellow's Mr. Sammler's Planet. I went right out and bought it. But to my chagrin I just could not get through it. I agree that Bellow is a more accomplished writer than say Philip Roth, whose Portnoy's Complaint came out a year before and was a scandalous success, far more overtly "Jewish" than anything Bellow has written. The judges who decide on the Nobel Prize for literature were right to give it to Bellow before Roth. However, the fact that they gave it this year to a completely insignificant Swedish poet, Tomas Transtromer, over someone of Roth's reputation and oeuvre, just shows how insignificant or silly the literary judges of the Swedish Academy are.

Bellow has never been a practicing Jew in any significant way. Has just published two pieces in The New York Review of Books about being a Jewish writer. This is an issue that has been forced on him by others trying to categorize him. He grew up as the son of Yiddish-speaking Russian immigrants. As he began to write he became conscious of how American WASP writers regarded him as an interloper. But this didn't faze him. "If WASPs wanted to think of me as a Jewish poacher on their precious cultural estates, then let them." He found comfort in Karl Shapiro's In Defense of Ignorance. Shapiro writes, "The European Jew was always a visitor. . .But in America everybody is a visitor. In the United States the Jewish writer is free to create his own consciousness."

But what IS a Jewish writer? What indeed is a Jewish painter? Chagall was, but Rothko not? It is as intractable a question as "who is a Jew". Yet it is fodder for academic courses and symposia and endless, pointless, fruitless self-justificatory debate, usually funded by non-practicing Jews as eager as religious evangelicals to assert their own particular brand of Jewish commitment.

Bellow quotes Shmuel Agnon, who thought you had to live in Israel to write in an authentic Jewish voice. But an Israeli like Haim Sabato writes as a religious Jew of Syrian origin. David Grossman and Amos Oz write as secular Israelis of European Ashkenazi provenance. There are good Arab writers in Hebrew. Israeli culture is not necessarily Jewish. I suspect Bellow and Grossman have more in common with each other than they both have with Sabato or Agnon. Israel has, at least in the arts, replaced "Jew" with something different and broader.

Bellow says that what defines a Jewish writer is "otherness", as when he talks about challenging the nihilism that led to the moral collapse of Europe. "One's language is a spiritual location; it houses your soul. If you were born in America all essential communications, your deepest communications with yourself, will be in English--in American English." So does that make him Jewish?

In truth, it is like being Jewish altogether. No one interpretation of being Jewish covers all cases. We live in a new, freer, more mobile and more fluid world that makes definition difficult and even sometimes undesirable. It includes categories and degrees in which those more involved are forever castigating those less so. It is just like those ghastly attempts to define Orthodox, Chareidi , or a Torah Jew. There will always be those who stand apart. You cannot define who is a Jewish writer. All you can ask is to what degree Jewish culture and values influence a person or his or her writing.

Assume someone discovered that Wagner had a Jewish grandmother on his maternal side. Would that make him a Jewish composer? Was Marx a Jewish thinker? Some academics will argue he is and that Freud could only have been a Jew. What stuff and nonsense. Tell that to Jung. What of all the other alienated, creative minds of nineteenth century Middle Europe? Do they qualify as Jewish?

We are concerned with labels because most people need labels. Our whole education system is predicated on them. But labels are dangerous, usually dishonest, incomplete handles that allow for and encourage discrimination, categorization, and indeed alienation.

Any practicing Jew knows the language of his soul is Torah. Any non-practicing but deeply committed Jew knows it is the practical reinforcement of actions or ideas that strengthens or weakens his sense of belonging. For some, like Bellow, it is enough to feel different. No one can take self-definition away from anyone. But one has the right and should challenge. If that was good enough for him, so be it. I just do not want people to try telling me how to define Jewish writing. It is like asking what identity a Nabokov had when he switched from Russian to English.

You can be a writer who happens to be a Jew, but that does not make you a Jewish writer. Bellow is a great American writer who avoids overtly Jewish issues. He says he is indeed a Jewish writer, but as he also says, to try to put one of the two first is as clumsy as the question, "Whom do you love better, your Papa or your Momma?" I suggest it is silly to label him a Jewish writer altogether. At most he is a Jew who writes.

6 Comments:

At 4:23 AM , Blogger Rob said...

Very nice piece Jeremy. You write about Bellow as if he were still alive. Some might say that is the ultimate compliment.

 
At 12:27 AM , Blogger Rebecca Klempner said...

I'm just visiting your blog for the first time, and I really appreciate this post. Your "what makes a Jewish writer a Jewish writer" question is one I've been contemplating a while.

It's funny, but I've read quite a few anthologies of Jewish writing recently. They contain a lot of stories in that category "authored by a Jew who writes." It can be very maddening when a Jewish writer writes something that is entirely objectionable according to Torah ideals.

On the other hand, I've seen books that aren't completely in sync with an Orthodox POV, yet are thoughtful, even-handed, insightful, and truly reflect the Jewish experience (like Nicole Krauss's The History of Love or Lovingkindness by Anne Roiphe). I wouldn't want to be so limited in defining Jewish writers as to exclude these two.

 
At 8:54 AM , Blogger Rabbi Jeremy Rosen said...

Rebecca
I completely agree, one cannot confine Jewishness to religion alone, however central it might be. My mystical side will talk about a soul however weakly the flame might burn and the rational side will accept that there are Jewish experiences of alienation, oppression and prejudice as well as pride and nationalism that canĀ strengthen identification with the Jewish people. Yet the real issue isĀ whether it is possible to transmit such ephemeral feelings to the next generation and in my opinion without a structured way of life its rather difficult to succeed ( though I accept no system is perfect and plenty of Jews brought up religiously have rejected it just as many without any family background have come to accept it ).
Welcome on board!
J

 
At 8:56 AM , Blogger Rabbi Jeremy Rosen said...

Rob
You are right I was ambiguous and re reading it I clearly should have made clear hes gone somewhere. I'm not sure he'd have agreed that its to a better world!
Thanks
J

 
At 5:00 PM , Anonymous dk said...

Jeremy,

Thank you for drawing attention to the two articles published on the website of the New York Review of Books which are excerpted from a talk originally given by Saul Bellow in 1988.

A Jewish Writer in America - part I
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/oct/27/jewish-writer-america/?pagination=false

A Jewish Writer in America - part II
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/nov/10/jewish-writer-america-ii/?pagination=false

They really do make interesting reading, especially from an English perspective because Bellow credits America with having afforded him a freedom (of identity and artistic expression) he didn't believe available in any other country other than Israel.

I think more interesting than the question 'who is a Jewish writer?' is, 'who is it who determines who is a Jewish writer'? because the question means something different depending on where it is asked, and so the answer will be different too.

 
At 11:00 AM , Blogger Rabbi Jeremy Rosen said...

dk:

And unfortunately the criteria of those who decide on "Great Britons" "Influential Rabbis" "Best Strippers" "Most Important Americans" whatever, are so banal, so ignorant, so dependent on publicity and self promotion ( The Best Doctors/Lawyers of New York are those who pay most for it) that they are meaningless.

I think we have to recognize that as with trying to decide "Who is a Jew" there is no way one will find a criterion that will statisfy everyone.

J

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home